A World Without Cancer – The Story of Vitamin B17
-
Rating:
/rating_on.png "1 Star")
/rating_half.png "4 Stars")
/rating_off.png "5 Stars")
Loading ... - Published date: May 20, 2011
- Category: Health
- Tags: B17, Edward Griffin
- Comments: 5 (Comment on this post)
- TinyURL: -
- Share:
This is a video adaptation of a documentary filmstrip which explains the scientific rationale for Laetrile therapy. It presents evidence that cancer, like scurvy or pellagra, is a deficiency disease. It is not caused by the presence of some mysterious virus or X- factor, but by the lack of an essential food factor which, increasingly, is deleted from the menus of modern man. The native diets of those cultures where cancer is rare is examined and found to be 200 times more rich in this substance than the diet of industrialized society. The missing food factor is called amygdalin or vitamin B17, but in its concentrated and purified form developed specifically for cancer therapy, it is known as Laetrile. A theoretical model for the biological action of Laetrile is presented. Included are dramatic case histories of terminal cancer patients who have recovered using Laetrile therapy. Based upon the book of the same name.
Comments on this post
seriously is thiis real?? anyone know where i can find some back up / proof /reasearch cus if its false its as bad as cancer itself
http://health.centreforce.com/health/krebs.html
This page has other good sources as well
I don’t think its real. From what I know its not the deficiency of a vitamin, but the excess of animal based foods in a persons diet that causes cancer, heart disease, obesity, etc etc – the sicknesses of the affluent countries. Have a read of the “China Study”, you’ll understand what I’m talking about.
On a subtle level this could be possible, it is well documented that people on a native diet don’t suffer from western illnesses even if there is meat in the diet. The China study rocks, but there’s even more to it than that, it’s just the beginning. This could be the subtle factor that makes the difference.
EVERYONE,
Have a read here:
http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/laetrile.html
It may be corrupted by some traditional, pharma-scum, but still, I can consider this relatively true. To quote:
“The Commission then evaluated the records of 44 patients treated according to the Krebs’ recommendations. Two years had elapsed since the first of these patients had been treated with Laetrile. Nineteen had already died and there was no evidence that Laetrile had helped any of the others.”
As always, remain wary.